PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CX and ^GSPC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.62%
5.95%
CX
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CX:

-0.69

^GSPC:

2.03

Sortino Ratio

CX:

-0.82

^GSPC:

2.71

Omega Ratio

CX:

0.90

^GSPC:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

CX:

-0.31

^GSPC:

3.04

Martin Ratio

CX:

-0.93

^GSPC:

12.93

Ulcer Index

CX:

26.97%

^GSPC:

2.00%

Daily Std Dev

CX:

36.24%

^GSPC:

12.72%

Max Drawdown

CX:

-93.80%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

CX:

-78.12%

^GSPC:

-2.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -4.25%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.22% annualized return.


CX

YTD

1.24%

1M

-1.72%

6M

-8.62%

1Y

-25.73%

5Y*

8.66%

10Y*

-4.25%

^GSPC

YTD

0.47%

1M

-2.98%

6M

5.95%

1Y

24.05%

5Y*

12.57%

10Y*

11.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CX is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CX is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CX is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CX, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.692.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for CX, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.822.71
The chart of Omega ratio for CX, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.901.37
The chart of Calmar ratio for CX, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.313.04
The chart of Martin ratio for CX, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.9312.93
CX
^GSPC

The current CX Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.69
2.03
CX
^GSPC

Drawdowns

CX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -93.80%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-78.12%
-2.98%
CX
^GSPC

Volatility

CX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.47%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.92%
4.47%
CX
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab